Blog
Welcome to the Busybird blog, where you can find helpful articles, updates, industry news and more. Make sure you stay up to date by signing up to our newsletter below.
Getting Organised: Part I
March 20, 2014Naming Your Files
Here’s something which shouldn’t be so hard. Yet it is.
And it makes me angry.
How do you name your files when you’re writing? Well, that should be simple. How about this?
- The Title of My Blog.doc
There. That’s easy. What else would you call it?
What about when you revise it? What do you call it then? Some people will call it this …
- The Title of My Blog.doc
That’s right. They’ll save right over the top of the old file. To this practice, I can say only two things …
WHAT? ARE YOU #&@!ING CRAZY!?
What happens if you mess up? What if you had a passage just right, you tweak it, mess it up, and can’t recall how you had it previously? How do you get it back? Time travel? What if you redraft numerous times, and need to go back three or four drafts to check on something – how do you manage that now? To the people who do this with their files, go sit in the corner for five minutes, then come back and resume reading. Go. Now.
Others might have a cleverer approach, something like this for their new version …
- The Title of My Blog (New).doc
It’s infallible. How can you go wrong? And the next revision might be:
- The Title of My Blog (Newer).doc
And the next one might be one:
- The Title of My Blog (Newest).doc
We could go on forever and whilst there’s some logic in it, there’s no real order, or capacity for multiple revisions – and, hey, this is writing. You might go through nine or ten drafts. I’ve gone through thirty or so with some short stories. Can you find that many variations of ‘New’?
Others might do this:
- The Title of My Blog (Revised).doc
Et al. Again, same problems. Words are powerful when used correctly, but for this sort of cataloguing they can be both limiting and confusing.
Some of you might be shaking your heads, condemning the folly of people who name their files like this. You might think yourselves logical. You might use something like this:
- The Title of My Blog – 26 January 2014.doc
There you go, a date delineating the draft. When you open the folder containing your piece, you’d hope to see this:
- The Title of My Blog – 26 January 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 1 February 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 24 February 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 2 March 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 10 March 2014.doc
That works, doesn’t it?
NO!
Most computers will list file names numerically. So, when you open the folder containing your files, it’ll actually look like this:
- The Title of My Blog – 1 February 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 2 March 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 10 March 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 24 February 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – 26 January 2014.doc
There’s the numerical sequence: 1, 2, 10, 24, 26. This will also hinder any attempt to use a numeric date, e.g. instead of 1 February 2014, using 1.02.2014. We’ll just get similar sorting. Also, you literally have to wade through every file to work out which is the most recent. Here, it’s the third file – and this is just a little list! What if we had twenty files to sort through?
Of course, we could have our computer sort our files by date, but why complicate issues? We should be making our lives as simple as possible.
How about if we put the month before the date? E.g.
- The Title of My Blog – February 1, 2014.doc
How does this look when we open our folder?
- The Title of My Blog – February 1, 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – February 24, 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – January 26, 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – March 2, 2014.doc
The Title of My Blog – March 10, 2014.doc
The computer – as computers do – sorts the files alphabetically. At least now the numerical sorting keeps those dates (within each month) in order, although that doesn’t do us much good overall when February comes before January.
Another issue with these methods is we don’t know how many drafts there’s been. We can’t look at all the variations of ‘New’, or all the dates, and know instantaneously that we’ve written five drafts. We actually have to count them up.
What we want is a method that lets us know, at a glance, which file is the newest and how many drafts we’ve gone through.
Here’s my method, beginning with my first file:
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.01).doc
1, meaning it’s my first draft. .01, meaning it’s the first version of that draft. Then, when I revise, it’s:
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.02).doc
When I open my folder, my files will be presented thus:
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.01).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.02).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.03).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.04).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.05).doc
All nice and neat.
This might seem like it’s unnecessarily complicating the issue. Why not just name them …?
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 2).doc
Etc.
Firstly, the length of file names changes when I go into double digits. E.g.
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 9).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 10).doc
It’s just a little thing, but it annoys me. I want things neat and aligned. The way to mitigate this would be to precede all the single numerals with a zero …
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 09).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 10).doc
Now they’re aligned.
But the problem still here is there’s no marked way of distinguishing between a redraft and a restructure or a rewrite. The differences?
- redraft: going over your piece from word one and revising
- restructure: chopping out whole sections, writing in whole new chapters that weren’t there before, shifting things around
- rewrite: opening a NEW document, and rewriting your piece from the very first word.
When I begin a restructure of a rewrite then I bump up the first digit and reset the decimal. E.g.
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 2.01)
This is the first draft of the rewrite, (and one that bears little structural similarity to its predecessor).
In a folder, I might see something like this:
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.01).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.02).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.03).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.04).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.05).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 2.01).doc
This tells me immediately that there were five drafts, then I either started from scratch, or restructured the hell out of it. It might require quick mathematics to know how many drafts overall if I have something like this …
- The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.01).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.02).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.03).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.04).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.05).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 2.01).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 2.02).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 2.03).doc
… but it’s not too hard to add .05 and .03 to get 8.
Finally, for any editors reading, when the author sends you their file, make sure you distinguish it from the file you work on. E.g.
- The Title of My Blog (original).doc
The Title of My Blog (Draft 1.01).doc
The file marked ‘(original)’ will always stand out alone as what the author sent me.
Ultimately, you don’t have to use this system. Just make sure that you do use a system, and it’s one that’s orderly – both for your computer and yourself.
L.Z.
Hurdles, Kitties and Too Many Food References
March 17, 2014There’s plenty of material on ‘being’ a writer. A library worth of books has been written on how to become a writer, how to improve one’s craft and the best ways for emerging writers to become established. Everyone has their own dollar to throw into the kitty when it comes to passing down advice to would-be writers and emerging talent in search of guidance or quick tips.
Why should I be the exception?
In my own development as a writer and editor, and in the natural development of fellow writers I’ve kept in regular contact with, there have been some turning points that have stood out to me. The challenge is different for everyone, but the markers for development are often the same. Here are some of the common hurdles I believe that, once overcome, mark massive developments in one’s writing career.
Finding the right confidence
This one is basically a no-brainer. But I still wanted to bring it up if only because the no-brainers are usually the ones that slip past the radar.
Having either too little or too much confidence are both common problems for writers, regardless of their level of development. Too little confidence leads to unfinished stories and writer’s block. Too much confidence leads to stunted development and an unwillingness to accept criticism or edits.
Keeping the right level of confidence is a daily challenge – propping yourself up enough to keep pumping out content and not getting bogged down in how unforgivably bad it might be, while keeping grounded and able to take feedback without launching into vicious self-defence.
Writing is subjective and highly variable. That means everything ever written is hit and miss – emphasis on that and between the two polar opposites. Even the piece you’ve been working on for months and consider your current magnum opus. Keep telling yourself that what you’re writing down is good – not horrible (because then you’ll stop writing out of depression), not brilliant (because it’s not), but good. And remember that every piece of feedback, every proposed edit, is a potential bullet-point for improvement.
Cooking the same meal every night
I like risotto. I cook a pretty good risotto, especially with chicken and mushroom. My partner loves it (or she at least she says she does – I’ll take the compliment at face value). But no matter how fluffy the rice, it’s not going to go down well if I cooked risotto every night. Occasionally she’s going to want me to at least serve up steak and chips. Or order pizza.
Thank God she’s a better cook than me.
Point being, variety is the spice of life. Keep your signature dish – and make sure you’re so good at it that no one can compare – but make sure there’s more to your skill range than historical romance or family drama, especially in short stories. The short story market is always starving for versatility, and even in the genre markets you can only get away with working the same ideas/angle/characters for so long.
The best result is that experimenting with different dishes opens up a whole new world of opportunities – some ingredients you never would have thought to try in your staple dishes. Good fantasy writing can sometimes come from experimenting with thrillers, as another method of inciting high stakes and excitement. Writing historical fiction, even if not your preference, often forces you to think more about setting and tone, which is universally beneficial. And so on.
Some experiments will be total failures that would be better served never seeing the light of day. But who cares? You stepped out of your comfort zone. You tried something new. And maybe you’ll find another form of writing you’re good at and enjoy that you would never have considered without the trial run.
Taking it all too seriously
Yes, this is a problem in my view. This includes being preoccupied with the importance of a piece, the intended weight of the themes and how it connects to the quote-unquote ‘zeitgeist’ – to the detriment of all the other elements of a good story.
It’s fine for a piece of writing to have serious themes. But if you’re writing a short story then you’re a storyteller. If you can tell a story that happens to revolve around the issue of deforestation in Tasmania, that’s fantastic; it’s an intriguing subject, it’s topical and it’s a strong stepping stone for conflict and interesting events. But it’s still a story – a piece of prose seeking an audience to entertain. Articles and creative non-fiction exist for a reason – to give an appropriate platform for seeking an audience to educate and convince on a particular viewpoint.
Fictional prose can still be serious, weighted, tied in with the big issues of the day. The tipping point is where the ‘why’ overwhelms the ‘what’ – where the agenda eclipses the actual story and its events. Audiences rarely have much patience for self-importance. They want a story. And the best writers place any agenda or issue they wish to discuss in service to the story. Not the other way around.
There are many more mini-epiphanies a writer will have throughout the early stages of their career – I’ve only covered the ones that strike me as among the most important. Please leave your comments and any other turning points you’ve experienced through your development. A little bit of collective wisdom never hurts.
– Beau Hillier.
Audiobooks vs Print Books
March 13, 2014Confessions of an Audiobook Listener
Audiobooks feel like cheating, like somehow listening is easier than reading. I am always careful not to laugh or pull faces when listening in public and when chatting about books, it feels like a lie to say, ‘At the moment I’m reading …’ but embarrassing to admit the truth. If I’m listening in the car and need to open the window, I turn down the volume.
There is a certain amount of stigma attached to audiobooks. They are terminally uncool. I know this because my mum has listened to them for years. That alone should be enough of a reason to banish me to hardcopy only or hide my audio habits behind a veil of secrecy. But here I am coming out and confessing …
I am pro audiobooks.
Now, don’t get me wrong – I love books too. And as someone who dabbles at writing I can’t deny fantasising about seeing my name and words in print, holding my book in my hands, or admiring it displayed on a shelf. Somehow, a disc or file name doesn’t hold the same awe factor.
But there is no reason why the two mediums can’t be used simultaneously. The lack of popularity is due to lack of education and people are simply not aware of their options. Personally, I find it rewarding to be reading and listening to different works at the same time. I will often have three or four on the go at once – one for the car, one for the Discman or iPod, one by the bed, and one for the train. So, I still read, but these days I find that I’m only choosing books that aren’t available on audio.
My mum averages about two audiobooks every three weeks. Since I jumped on the bandwagon, I’ve infected other members of my family. Despite the different ages, attitudes, and lifestyles, audio has a definite appeal.
It’s time for a brainstorm, time to look at the pros and cons and announce the Championship Fight: Audiobooks vs. Hardcopy books. Bring it on.
Spoken audio has been available since the 1930s but it wasn’t until the 1980s that the medium attracted book retailers. Audiobooks, once distributed on cassette tapes, are now available on CD, downloadable digital formats for portable devices and preloaded digital.
The ‘experience’ of reading a book or listening to one being read varies for everyone. Some find audiobooks too slow and that they can read faster themselves while others find audio relaxing and requires less effort, which allows them to be drawn into the story. The two methods stimulate and engage in entirely different ways.
Audio appeals to the multi-tasker. Unlike books, you can easily listen while remaining mobile and productive. It is a perfect distraction for the reluctant exerciser and stimulating on long car drives or on public transport when sardine carriages make holding a book awkward. It accompanies housework, craft, cooking, gardening or any other monotonous or passive task. You feel like you’re working your brain rather than just filling in time or silence as you might with music. For those who struggle to have time or motivation for reading, with an audiobook you can trick yourself into thinking you are not really reading at all. It is less a chore and more entertainment.
People relax by plonking themselves down in front of the television and switching off their brains, letting bad jokes and soppy drama wash over them. Audios can have a similar purpose and effect. And there is still the sense of satisfaction when finished – similar to reading – that is not often found at the end of a night of watching television.
There is a convenience and flexibility to audio and the right voice can bring the story and characters to life. Also, listening can often soften the blow of an otherwise daunting read. What might appear large or overwhelmingly literary in book form, can – in audio – push you through until you’re hooked, thus not allowing you to get lost or bogged down by slabs of text or complicated vocabulary.
But they have problems too. A few scratches can completely ruin a disc and the momentum of the story can be lost similarly to ripping out some pages a book. For those who are easily distracted you can find you lose concentration and miss important details and if you are a person who reads in bed, unfortunately an audio will not stop when you fall asleep.
The biggest factor for audiobooks is the voice, which can be the difference between loving it and not finishing it. If the person has an accent you can have trouble understanding or following. The voice could be annoying and grating. Their tone can influence your view of the characters, they can change the mood of the story and can influence whether you like the book.
Those who listen on CDs are restricted to the car or an often bulky Discman. As this technology is becoming outdated the selection for purchase is limited. Luckily now there are MP3 CD options and downloadable formats but there are many people who don’t have the knowledge or ability to search and download. It is unfortunate that the medium is not more widely marketed and accessible or promoted.
Downloadable audiobooks cost slightly less than hardcovers but more than their paperback equivalents. Market penetration of audiobooks is substantially lower than for their printed counterparts despite the high market penetration achieved by audio music products.
Aesthetically, an audiobook is lightweight, encased in plastic and has a cheap, tacky feel whereas books have a pleasurable physicality and give a tactile sense of place and pacing which can build expectation as the reader progresses. There is a certain satisfaction to holding a book. Solid and meaningful. The smell, the visual impression of a bookshelf full of tomes, all hold something beautiful that is irreplaceable.
Hardcopy format make it easier to revisit and locate particular parts or passages, do not rely on batteries or electricity and can provide a barrier and a safe place for your eyes in public awkwardness. On an educational level books normalise correct spelling as well as instil formatting and punctuation skills.
Both mediums are free through local libraries and available for purchase, although obviously books are more wildly sold in retail outlets. Audiobooks on cassette or CD are typically more expensive due to the added expense of recording and the lack of the economy of scale of high ‘print’ runs that are available in the publishing of printed books. However, there are certain economies of scale that favour downloadable audiobooks, which do not carry mass production costs, do not require storage of a large inventory, do not require physical packaging or transportation and even if ‘returned’ do not require a cost of physical return or destruction/disposal. If such economies were passed on to customers, unit profit margins would be reduced but sales volumes would increase. It is not known what affect this would have on book sales in other formats.
About forty percent of all audiobook consumption occurs through public libraries, with the remainder served primarily through retail bookstores. Library download programs are currently experiencing rapid growth (more than 5,000 public libraries offer free downloadable audiobooks).
So, audio is on the rise and may slowly but surely shake its daggy reputation but hardcopy has stood the test of time. Who has won today’s showdown?
Well, that’s up to you.
M.B.
The Return
March 10, 2014So, the sleeper awakes. 2012 has become 2014 and a lot has happened in that time. Were the other options really that bad to make Tony Abbott the people’s choice for PM? Since when could a pope just resign? And what the hell is twerking?
You’d think in that time the compound interest in our bank accounts could have accumulated to make us the richest editors in the known universe. But no.
Therefore, in the absence of a fortune that would have been made redundant from inflation anyway, we’ve rubbed the gunk out of our eyes and ordered an oil drum full of coffee to help kick-start the brain cells. There’s a lot of work to do, and you can be a part of it if you have a story to tell. Or even if you’re intrigued by the idea of owning a collection of stories and poems, hand-picked from emerging talent from Australia and beyond.
page seventeen is back for Issue 11.
In 2013 we needed to take a hiatus. Partly because at the time I wasn’t able to devote myself to the level required, and that’s my failing. But also because we needed time to slow down and consider how we can keep this beautiful little collection going.
It’s probably worth noting here that I define ‘going’ as different from ‘surviving’. We’re surviving just fine. But now more than ever, freshness and adaptability is part of a process to ensure we’re not just surviving, we’re thriving. Page seventeen is about showcasing the writers that no one’s heard of yet, and celebrating new talent. Anything which bolsters page seventeen’s presence, and increases its reach across Australia and international markets, is added exposure for the featured writers.
All of this preamble leads to page seventeen’s first e-edition, currently intended to run alongside the print edition so that both the old-fashioned and the new-fangled can enjoy the latest collection. More on this further down the line.
Our submission window will open on April 15 as per previous issues. The traditional competitions will also be in effect from April 15 until June 30, so be prepared as we want to be wowed. Wake us up. We want your most unpredictable mysteries, your most captivating characters and your most dynamic tangents. You – yes, you, the one I’m aggressively pointing at – can make this issue the best yet.
There’ll be more activities on the horizon, which we’ll talk about as we go along. But for now, watch this space. Like us on Facebook and Twitter if you haven’t already. Drop us a line at pageseventeen.at.busybird.com.au. And get excited!
Beau Hillier | Editor, page seventeen
Research for Writers
March 6, 2014This time last year, just about the only writing I was doing was shopping lists and putting my baby’s check-up appointment times into the calendar. As a new mother, writing projects were the last thing I was thinking about. As the year progressed, my attitude towards writing ranged from apathy to frustration at not being able to follow through on my good intentions to write.
I recently attended a workshop with Hazel Edwards. After six hours of discussing various elements of writing and publishing, I asked Hazel what tips she has, having been through this herself, for writers who are mothers of young children. It’s all nice to talk about synopses and pitches to publishers, but how the heck do I get to that stage when I’m at home with a 15 month old?
I was expecting her to say something like, Writers write. You need to make it a priority, even with young children, and write every day and I hoped she might have some magical practical tips on how to do this and still get the family fed and the house cleaned. Her response surprised me, and was refreshingly encouraging.
Firstly, she said to take the pressure off myself. (Really? You’re not going to chastise me for my lack of productivity?) Secondly, and this is what I want to elaborate on, she said to use this time for research. This period of my life – staying home with a baby – won’t last forever, and though I may not be writing much at the moment, there are ways I can use this season to grow as a writer and develop my writing for the future.
As I have thought about the concept of using my life as research, I have come up with the following suggestions. I’ve written them from the point of view as a mother, but these are certainly not aimed solely at new parents and can be adapted for any writer. We all face challenging circumstances at some stage, some of which will prevent us from having the time or energy to write, be it sickness (ourselves or close friends/relatives), changes in work pressures, study that does not lend itself to your writing projects – whatever it is, I hope you find these suggestions helpful in preparing you for the next season of your life when you are able to dedicate more time to writing.
Keep a journal
You don’t need to write in it every day. And you don’t need to show it to anyone else. Journals serve a number of purposes. Firstly, they get you writing. It might not be the same style as your creative writing, but at least it’s getting you thinking of words and stringing together sentences more comprehensive than ‘Ooh, look! Doggy! Woof woof!’ Secondly, it’s a great record of memories, which can be used later to shape your stories. You are able to write more authentically into particular situations, based on your personal experience. It will also be invaluable if you one day choose to write a memoir. Thirdly, journaling is a good habit to get into with therapeutic benefits as you process the joys and challenges of life. (Journals also make great pieces of memorabilia to put in a museum when you become famous.)
Keep a writing journal
Different to your personal journal, this is a notebook where you can scribble anecdotes and ideas (and stick in shopping dockets or used envelopes or whatever else you write sudden bursts of inspiration on) based on your observations of the world around you. Take it with you when you go shopping or on public transport and observe people – this could be the seed for some great characters later on. You might see something strange or humorous that could trigger a storyline, or hear some thought-provoking dialogue. Building up a store of these journals will be well worth the effort later when you’re searching for ideas.
If writing in a journal is too much effort (‘Is there a pen in this house that actually works?’), use a dictaphone (or the recording feature on your phone). Keep it in an easily accessible location such as beside your bed or in your handbag/nappy bag. (Hmm, then again, it could get lost in there.) When you get an idea, you can ramble it off and refer to it later. Plus, it’s easy to use while rocking a baby to sleep. Bub doesn’t care about what you’re saying – she just likes to hear your voice. So rather than get frustrated as you hold her for hours, have your dictaphone handy and talk through your ideas for the next chapter of your novel, or record some dialogue to transcribe later.
Read
As mentioned in previous Busybird blogs, writers need to be readers. So while bub has his nap, curl up with a good book. Or read while feeding. Hey, you’re spending hours a day sitting in your favourite comfy chair anyway, why not spend the time reading? Maybe not hardcovers, should it slip from your grip, but I discovered that I could hold a chunky paperback with one hand and got pretty good at page turns with a dexterous pinky. Reading can also provide a well-earned mental and physical break.
Take photos
A picture tells a thousand words, right? So take a few snaps, write about them later, and there’s a short story. (Sort of.) When you’re out and about, observe your surroundings and take some photos (and try to get some subjects other than your baby). If you want something a bit different to keep your creative juices flowing, use a ‘photo a day’ (or similar – Google it) list for themes/concepts to look out for. You don’t need to have a fancy camera, or be an expert photographer. Just use your phone to capture images that can trigger memories later. The photos you take today just might be the inspiration you need for a really powerful description of setting in the future.
If the circumstances of your life are preventing you from writing, don’t feel frustrated. You can still grow as a writer now. Capture the sights, sounds and emotions in your current experiences and file them away for future reference to inform your writing later.
J.G.